Tea Taster
(CAT 2017)
A
tea taster was assigned to rate teas from six different locations – Munnar,
Wayanad, Ooty, Darjeeling, Assam and Himachal. These teas were placed in six
cups, numbered 1 to 6, not necessarily in the same order. The tea taster was
asked to rate these teas on the strength of their flavour on a scale of 1 to
10. He gave a unique integer rating to each tea. Some other information is
given below:
1.
Cup 6 contained tea from Himachal.
2. Tea from Ooty got the highest rating, but it was not in Cup 3.
3. The rating of tea in Cup 3 was double the rating of the tea in Cup 5.
4. Only two cups got ratings in even numbers.
5. Cup 2 got the minimum rating and this rating was an even number.
6. Tea in Cup 3 got a higher rating than that in Cup 1. 7. The rating of tea from Wayanad was more than the rating of tea from Munnar, but less than that from Assam.
2. Tea from Ooty got the highest rating, but it was not in Cup 3.
3. The rating of tea in Cup 3 was double the rating of the tea in Cup 5.
4. Only two cups got ratings in even numbers.
5. Cup 2 got the minimum rating and this rating was an even number.
6. Tea in Cup 3 got a higher rating than that in Cup 1. 7. The rating of tea from Wayanad was more than the rating of tea from Munnar, but less than that from Assam.
Questions
1.
What was the second highest rating given?
2.
What was the number of the cup that contained tea from Ooty?
3.
If the tea from Munnar did not get the minimum rating, what was the rating of
the tea from Wayanad?
(A) 3
(B) 5
(C) 1
(D) 6
(A) 3
(B) 5
(C) 1
(D) 6
4.
If cups containing teas from Wayanad and Ooty had consecutive numbers, which of
the following statements may be true?
(A) Cup 5 contains tea from Assam
(B) Cup 1 contains tea from Darjeeling
(C) Tea from Wayanad has got a rating of 6
(D) Tea from Darjeeling got the minimum rating
(A) Cup 5 contains tea from Assam
(B) Cup 1 contains tea from Darjeeling
(C) Tea from Wayanad has got a rating of 6
(D) Tea from Darjeeling got the minimum rating
For Answers click here.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete